The political noise is deafening these days and, whether it’s Brexit or the US mid-term elections, expect it to get louder still.
For Brexit, we have the Labour Party conference starting 23rd September (will the leadership be forced to adopt a motion for a second referendum?) and the Conservative Party conference soon after that (will the EU provide some positive titbits for May to help stave off a leadership battle, in order to avoid a hard Brexiteer replacement?).
There is a chance of better visibility by mid-November but January is probably the concrete deadline for agreement to meet the March 2019 deadline, assuming a deal is met. Don’t forget too, any deal needs UK political assent, and this is just the exit. So, expect some volatility around these dates, especially for sterling.
For the US mid-terms in November, tensions are rising too, not least around the trade war with China and the Mueller investigation into the Trump 2016 presidential campaign.
All headline-grabbing stuff, as investors are desperate for a clue as to the most likely outcome. This is compounded by the fact that investor self-confidence in predicting political outcomes has fallen, although it probably needs to fall further to reach more realistic levels. Look at the chart below, it plots the odds of a Bremain outcome in June 2016: consistently between 70% and 90%.
This is not new news but it is worth remembering. Similarly, for most of this year, many investors have written off the chance of a significant trade war between the US and China. It seems they were wrong and, in the meantime, it has had a material impact on financial markets.
We believe there are certain parts of the risk environment that are almost impossible to analyse but there are also areas that we can get our heads around, if we keep focus and look through the noise.
US economic growth is strong. The ISM manufacturing survey (which tends to have a pretty good relationship with GDP) recently reached a multi-year high, while most consumer confidence surveys are at, or close to, multi-year highs (the consumer is a big swing factor for the US economy). We also know that, despite this decent growth outlook, the fiscal stimulus for the US will be strong this year and next (as opposed to being used as counter cyclical policy which boosts a weaker economy).
Therefore, it seems fair to ask whether or not the US economy is over-heating? Well, surprisingly perhaps, inflation at a consumer price level is being very well behaved but labour markets are tight and wages seem to be on a steady trend upwards, though not at threatening levels yet. The Fed tends to put more of an emphasis on the dynamics in the labour market and so we expect rates to continue to rise gradually. More generally, across the major developed economies, wage growth is close to, or above, cyclical highs.
Indeed, most of the other major economies seem to be growing at a fair old clip. Germany’s key IFO business survey is close to multi-year highs, while concerns remain as to the degree of slowing in the Chinese economy, though policy measures are being introduced to try to address this.
All in all, our base case remains broadly unchanged this year: decent growth, with rates rising gently. That said, we underappreciated the degree to which tighter US liquidity and global trade tensions would hurt emerging markets. Fortunately, we weren’t invested in the likes of Turkey, Argentina and Russia but we have reduced our exposure to emerging market equity and bonds.
Key questions that remain unanswered as we move towards the fourth quarter are whether emerging market risk remains idiosyncratic or becomes systemic and the profile of wages growth.
In the meantime, in line with tighter US liquidity, the ‘survival of the fittest’ continues to dominate what we do. In practice, this means we continue to pay attention to rate sensitivity. At an asset class level, for equities we have a preference for less indebted companies, in bonds we prefer short duration, good quality credit, and in currencies, where we have exposure to non-GBP assets, we have a bias to economies that have more sustainable external funding requirements.
For Investment Professionals only. Not for onward distribution. No other persons should rely on any information contained within this document.
Source for information: Miton as at 19/09/2018 unless otherwise stated.
The views expressed are those of the fund manager at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. They are not necessarily the views of Miton and do not constitute investment advice. Any mention of a specific stock is not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Miton has used all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in the communication, however some information and statistical data has been obtained from external sources. Whilst Miton believes these sources to be reliable, Miton cannot guarantee the reliability, completeness or accuracy of the content or provide a warrantee.
The Prospectus, KIID and application forms are available in English from the Authorised Corporate Director of the fund, Link Fund Solutions, at www.linkfundsolutions.co.uk ; or from Miton, the Investment Manager of the fund, at www.mitongroup.com.
This financial promotion is issued by Miton, a trading name of Miton Asset Management Limited the Investment Manager of the Fund which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in England No. 1949322 with its registered office at 6th Floor, Paternoster House, 65 St Paul’s Churchyard, London, EC4M 8AB.